On the advice of an overly excited friend
(and extremely poor judgement on my part), I picked up a copy of 50 Shades of
Grey. Yes, you could say that I succumbed to peer pressure, but it was the
intrigue generated by all the talk in the media that really pushed me to pick
up the copy. Now, reluctantly, I began reading the book, but if I’m really
being honest, it’s the chemistry and the spark which the protagonists shared
that made me read the first 150 pages with keen interest. That being said, I still
haven’t finished the first book. My initial reaction to the sex was the obvious
– getting absolutely flushed and red-faced. But, moving past the sex and the
obvious chemistry (obvious only because author EL James was probably giving
voice to one of her deepest, darkest fantasies), it got me thinking. This is,
after all, modern-day America where what passes as regular entertainment are
reality shows like ‘Teen Moms’ and ‘13 & Pregnant’, one has to really stop
and take note of the glaring fact – James is delusional.
I may not read as often as I’d like to but
when I do, I’d like to at least read something that makes a bit of sense (maybe
that’s not necessarily how I would put it but let’s just say for argument sake,
it needs to be a little rooted in reality), even if it’s mindless
entertainment. For one, there are probably little to no virgins left in
America. But let’s give the author the benefit of the doubt and say that there
are a few (at the “tender” age of 19). Is she trying to sell the audience on the
fact that Anastasia was such a prude that she didn’t know how things work or
what she’s supposed to do? I, for one, find that incredibly hard to believe.
But, let’s continue to give her the benefit of the doubt and still say that
that’s a possibility as well. Does the author expect us to believe that the
protagonist is the quintessential girl next door, damsel in distress and the
humble beauty all rolled into one? Reality check, anyone?
Despite that, I'd still say all these
aspects are forgivable. Because let’s face it, chick-lit thrives on lonely,
unhappy women living vicariously through the characters they read about. But
what I do not understand is why, if this is in fact erotica, did James forget
what she was really writing (or trying to) and introduce the emotional angle?
If it’s “mommy porn” at the end of the day, it would have probably gained a lot
more readership if she’d stuck solely to the sex and BDSM (Bondage and
Sadomasochism) and completely bypassed the whole emotional atyachaar of
disappointment and heartache. Did she think that women were incapable of
enjoying sex purely for the act? It is the 21st century for crying
out loud!
But if that’s not enough, she goes a step
further to give this dysfunctional relationship a “happy ending” because, who
doesn’t want a happily ever after, right? But, if any sane person were in her
place (here: Anastasia), they’d probably run as fast as they could the other
way! For one, Christian Grey was a sadist. And let’s be honest here, men are
not prone to changing who they really are. Secondly, he has a ‘Red Room of
Pain’ as Ana calls it; complete with very frightful looking “toys” (if you
could call it that) that he uses to subdue his victim. The fact that that’s how
she describes him should make any women look for an escape route even before
anything really starts. I mean, you’ve got to be really sick, probably a
masochist, if you’re okay with being treated like that. Yes, there are people
who are into that level of kinky but I don’t think any man would disrespect his
woman in that way if he really loved her. This brings me back to my point of
the emotional angle being introduced. In such kind of writing, emotions don’t
really have a part. And in order to truly enjoy the dirty sex part of the
story, it needed to be devoid of emotions. James should have ignored the “Will
my book really sell if I leave out the emotions?” thought and left out the
commercial appeal to her book and maybe, then we could have forgiven the bad
writing and appreciated the book for what it’s really meant to be – the
satisfaction of one’s carnal desires.
After reading the column ‘Grey Science’ by
Deblina Chakrabarty in the September issue of MW, my aversion to reading the
rest of the book was only further realised. The column may not be the best
opinion piece I’ve read on the 50 Shades phenomenon but she does touch upon
some great points. As she rightly calls it, “A clichéd fairytale dressed up as
a sex romp.” That is the reason I finally voice my opinion on the 50 Shades of
Grey series (50 Shades of Grey, 50 Shades Darker and 50 Shades Freed – though I
really wonder what Ana’s been freed from, the “bondage” or her insane need to
be dominated.) I cannot seem to understand the fascination with BDSM. Is it
that we’re all closet masochists appreciating the unspoken truth that lies
beneath or are we all just emotionally damaged that we cannot distinguish
between healthy sex and that which is bordering on the criminally insane (of
sorts). But, to each his own I guess.
